Monday, 7 May 2012

Assignment 1: Workflow


I have chosen to photograph Brisbane by night for this first Digital Photographic Practice assignment. This is not a type of photography I have done before (apart from the odd travel snap), so I thought it would be a good challenge for me.

I have separated out the phases of the workflow below into Pre-shoot preparation, The shoot, Post-shoot, Post-processing and Final steps. I have then put some notes on each individual image I am submitting and finish with a concluding note at the end of this document.

Pre-shoot preparation planned steps:
1.     Establish subject matter
2.     Plan time of day/ rough location for shoot
3.     Choose appropriate camera equipment
4.     Check batteries are charged
5.     Check memory cards are formatted and ready to be used
6.     Check settings on camera are appropriate
7.     Prepare other equipment

Pre-shoot preparation comments:
1.     My plan for this assignment was to photograph Brisbane by night. The city is separated into north and south sides, and there is a lovely river running through it with lots of bridges crossing it. I thought these would make a good subject, as would the various other interesting buildings in the area. I planned to ride my bike so I could easily access more than one location without too much walking in between. I wish to mostly concentrate on buildings/bridges but possibly include a few images with people in them. I plan to use a variety of focal lengths and shutter speeds (though obviously will be constrained by low-light levels and thus longer shutter speeds).
2.     I planned to shoot for the couple of hours after sunset, over two to three sessions, and I have consulted a map and planned out some possible locations:
   Southbank wheel
   Southbank beach
   Kurilpa pedestrian bridge
   Art Gallery complex
   Roma St pedestrian bridge over road
   Kangaroo point cliffs
   Roma St Parklands
   The mall
   Any interesting buildings that I find
3.     I only have my Canon 30D, so that is the camera I will be using. I will be shooting using available light and thus won't need a flash. However a tripod (with quick-release plate screwed tightly on camera), and cable release will be vital, as will a spare (fully charged) battery. By planning to shoot over several evenings, I have the flexibility of changing which lenses I take depending on what my plan is for the specific shoot. My 24-70mm f/2.8 lens is my main workhorse, so that is my starting point, and I can also bring along a prime (50mm f/1.4), wide-angle (17-35mm f/2.8) or tele-photo zoom (70-200mm f/2.8).
4.     Check batteries are both fully charged (and bring spare in bag).
5.     Check memory cards are formatted before starting out and bring spares in my bag (though I very rarely actually fill a whole 8gigabyte card, except for on holidays).
6.     Camera settings will depend on available light when I am actually out shooting, but I try to remember to reset before each shooting session.
7.     Other equipment in this case is my light meter, notepad (and pencil). I also need transport, so my bike, helmet, lights, lock and rack with bungy cord for attaching equipment to. A mobile phone to check sunset times is also handy, and a watch for measuring shutter speeds if using 'bulb' function. I had expected mild or warm weather and was a bit caught out the first session where I only had a raincoat for warmth (it was suddenly cool and windy), so I then remembered to bring a warm shirt for the next sessions in addition  to my coat.

I suspect this part of the workflow is quite similar to what other photographers do, though I know some would consider renting equipment for a specific shoot, and perhaps I would do so in some circumstances (certain exotic destinations, or involving animals and thus longer lenses may be useful). Later models of cameras may go through memory cards faster, or studio shoots where hundreds of images are shot over a short space of time would also require more data storage. Potentially in this situation a photographer would choose to shoot tethered to a computer for direct transfer of files also.

The shoot planned steps:
1.     Find location and  choose a viewpoint
2.     Set up tripod, camera, cable release
3.     Light meter to check exposure if necessary
4.     Set camera mode, ISO, focus mode, metering mode, white balance
5.     Set aperture/shutter as required
6.     Take a test shot, check on camera and adjust above as required
7.     Adjust exposure compensation if not using manual mode
8.     Try a range of shots at each location
9.     Move to next location

The shoot comments:
1.     Various locations were chosen, depending mostly on time of day, lighting and any pre-visualised ideas. A viewpoint suitable for the light levels was selected (i.e. including the sky if there is still light present (up to 15 minutes after sunset), or try to avoid too much sky after this time).
2.     Set up my equipment, remembering to use cable releases for most images.
3.     I didn’t use the light meter for most shots
4.     ISO was kept as low as practicably possible (usually 200), in order to produce the highest quality images (particularly important for night images which can be noisy), focus mode on ‘one shot’, and I used a mix of manual and autofocus on my lenses, white balance was generally left on daylight setting (I use RAW+ JPEG capture so can alter WB in post-processing if necessary).
5.     Aperture and shutter speeds were set manually, depending on the effect I wanted to have, and remembering that I was using partial metering setting.
6.     Test shot, sometimes a series, adjusting framing and exposure settings. I checked the histogram on some shots when I was unsure about highlight clipping (though note that the histogram displayed on the camera is based on the JPEG not the RAW file, so sometimes the JPEG is clipped by the RAW file won’t be). Exposure comes down to personal taste to some extent, but it’s important to be aware of clipping of highlights or shadows.
7.     Generally I used manual mode so this step was not required.
8.     Sometimes I tried a couple of different framing angles, or turned around to change my viewpoint, or moved a few metres, or adjusted the tripod slightly.
9.     Moving location involved packing all gear back up onto my bike and moving, which was certainly good for carrying lots of heavy equipment but putting the tripod down every time was a small hassle. I would use the bike again however, because it is a very efficient way of getting from place to place, which can be important when the available light is low and changing fast.

I went out for three sessions. I went after work each time, as I was then already in the city approximately 30 minutes before sunset, so I could get to a good location when the sun was setting to attempt to capture some photos in the short time period when the sky is still partially light. I captured some images when it was still light (i.e. before sunset) on all three sessions, but was unhappy with these images so have not included them in the set, instead concentrating on those images after the sun had set. The first session was very windy and I think this is evident in the photos – there is a slight blur on some of those with longer shutter speeds. I was unhappy generally with my third photo session during the shoot (I was quite tired and ready to go home), but surprisingly pleased with the actual images when I loaded them up and reviewed them later on the computer. These comprise most of the images I am submitting for this assignment.

I expect shooting is quite a personal exercise and each photographer approaches a shoot in their own way. It would be interesting to work with a professional for a day to see how they go about their shooting workflow. This part of the workflow depends heavily on experience, and as I learn more (constantly) about how my camera works, for example different metering modes, my shooting methodology changes. Now that I am using Lightroom I may switch to only shooting RAW and not worry about JPEG, but I’m not at that point yet. I don’t always use manual mode for shooting, as I find in quickly changing situations it’s easier to use Aperture priority and adjust the exposure compensation as required, though I appreciate that there is power in using full manual mode.


Post-shoot planned steps:
1.     Upload card contents to computer via Lightroom import feature.
1.     Rename file
2.     Add in IPTC data
3.     Add keywords
4.     Select destination folder
2.     Review images initially to determine clear rejects
3.     Add further IPTC data such as location and keywords to remaining images
4.     The select phases, including a review period
5.     Final choice of images for post-processing

Post-shoot comments:
1.     The Lightroom import is a quick and easy process. It starts automatically when a card is put in the card reader.
1.     I change the name to add in the date before the automatic file name
2.     A metadata preset applies basic IPTC data to each file
3.     Keywords are added at this stage (e.g. Brisbane, Night, DPP1) – more can be added later but it’s a good idea to add some at the import stage
4.     Destination folder (for both raw and jpeg files out of the camera) in this case is /Photos/DPP1/Part_1_Workflow/Assignment_1/
2.     The technical edit. Images are reviewed in full screen mode and the ‘x’ shortcut is used to highlight reject images. These are reviewed a second time (using the Flag filter feature) and deleted later.
3.     I add in specific location information and any keywords that may not have been applied at the initial import step. The auto-complete feature in Lightroom makes keywording much easier than in Digikam where I had to click on each keyword to apply it.
4.     Image rating takes place in (a minimum of) two steps – an initial review, and then further reviews (after a break) to refine the selection, progressively increasing the use of higher stars, and focusing in to determine the ‘best’ images. In the case of this assignment, I need to submit 6 to 12 images, so was aiming to have at least a dozen images at 3 star level to consider my final selection from.
5.     Of these 3 star images I then whittled my selection down to 7 chosen images for submission, giving them each 4 stars.

I imagine the Post-shoot workflow described above is fairly standard, with only minor variation between photographers, perhaps use of different star levels, or colours, or order of steps. Some photographers probably spend more time keywording, for example, if they sell to stock image sites etc.

Post-processing planned steps (selected images only):
1.     Change size and resolution, save as new file in tiff format
2.     Apply white balance correction
3.     Apply curves and levels adjustments
4.     Localised editing
5.     Creative editing
6.     Crop
7.     Save as a tiff file and as a jpeg (sharpened for screen/print as necessary)

Post-processing comments:
1.     Open images in Photoshop (right-click menu in Lightroom). Change size to 12 x 18 inches, and resolution to 300 ppi, and save in tiff format with extension _18x12_001.tif
2.     Using layers, apply white balance correction to images as necessary. I have not got a calibration setup for my monitor yet, though I do realize this is important (I have just purchased a new factory calibrated monitor, and my next purchase will be a calibration setup).
3.     Apply levels/curves as layers to whole image, when using levels use the 'alt' key to see impact. Adjust opacity to curves to decrease impact.
4.     Editing as required, for example spot healing, cloning on dust spots, noise from long exposure times etc. There was a bit of noise in the sky in some images, and also some strange colours probably from long exposure times and lights. Where this looked strange I removed it (only over very small areas). For cloning/spot healing I zoomed right in and then progressively out, as sometimes I felt like I could see the spots clearer at different zoom levels. I am now doing this on a layer of it’s own so that I can see the effect of removing spots etc.
5.     On a couple of images I felt they needed a bit more punch. I used a duplicate layer and changed the layer setting to ‘colour dodge’ at a low opacity setting.
6.     Cropping as necessary for each image (creative choice, such as using 1:1, or 5:4, or regular 8x10 for printing etc). I did adjust the perspective on a couple of images as I had buildings at slightly strange angles (due to wide-angle framing). I did this using the crop tool and keeping the ratio constant (18x12). In this case I have kept all images at 18x12 ratio.
7.     Tiff file to maintain layers so I can return to later, and matching jpeg file for printing etc. Back in Lightroom I can create a lower resolution jpeg for uploading to blog/flickr etc when I am happy with the final set of images.

I foresee that the above workflow will change as I learn more about what can be done in Lightroom. At this stage I’m only just learning about it so will use Photoshop for most of my post-processing, but I hope to move some of the more simple post work into Lightroom to improve efficiency. I have noted some websites that have Develop presets which look like they offer some automated creative starting points which I will experiment with at some point.

Using sophisticated software such as Lightroom and Photoshop for managing and editing images means that there is much room for variation between photographers. I have recently completed a basic Photoshop course, and the workflow above is somewhat based on what I learned there. I have also done some reading online and in books (e.g. Evening 2005, Evening 2010) which has assisted in my workflow development.

Final planned steps
1.     Backup of data
2.     Export for web/submission
3.     Printing

Final steps comments
1.     Backup of Lightroom catalogue on exit (once per day). Backup using automated program (Areca) at least weekly (use a calendar alert to remind me) onto external HD, one stored locally, one offsite, swapped every few weeks.
2.     Export for web using Lightroom, with JPEG quality at 80%, and with ‘sharpen for screen turned on. I also exported a set of JPEG at 100% quality to include with this assignment submission, and used the ‘sharpen for screen option.
3.     Export for printing with ‘sharpen for matte/glossy’ turned on. Take to local printer (Officeworks or similar) for printing at various sizes (this is a step I don’t do very often but perhaps should consider doing more).

Backup of data is one issue worth considering in more detail. I currently back up to two hard drives and rotate them between work and home. I have considered online backup of some files, but the challenge would be choosing which ones, and how to go about it, considering relatively slow upload speeds and large file sizes. Another option is to use optical media for archival purposes of data. Again, file size is an issue, and there is a large investment in time spent burning DVDs and labelling and storing safely. I like the 3-2-1 backup strategy mentioned on the dpbestflow website (dpbestflow.org, Accessed 1 May 2012), that is a ‘minimum of three copies of each file, stored on two different media types, and one copy should be stored off site’. I have not yet considered the use of DNG for my image files.

Images:
My selected, processed images are detailed below.


Photo 1: Kurilpa Bridge


Photo 2: Grey St Bridge

Photo 3: Brisbane City Library

Photo 4: Brisbane Wheel

Photo 5: View of M3

Photo 6: Casino

Photo 7: Train tracks

Conclusions:
Overall I have found the process of maturing my workflow to be enjoyable and rewarding. This assignment has allowed me to push my boundaries to tackle something I have not done much before, that is photography after dark. I feel like my set of images is satisfactory and that having a good work flow has helped me to produce better work than perhaps I would have otherwise.

I envisage that as I learn about the new tools I have recently employed (Lightroom specifically), my workflow will change somewhat, but I feel like this assignment and preceeding exercises have given me the ability to understand and improve my workflow by myself.

References:
American Society of Media Photographers, (2012) dpbestflow [online] Avaliable from: http://www.dpbestflow.org [Accessed 1 May 2012]

Evening, M. (2005) Adobe Photoshop CS2 for Photographers. Oxford: Elsevier

Evening, M. (2010) The Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 3 Book. Berkeley: Peachpit







2012 Sony World Photography Awards


Today I read in the Guardian about the winning photographers from the Sony World Photographer Awards 2012. A selection of images can be viewed here. They are an impressive and highly varied set of images, which cover a wide variety of categories.

In terms of creative images, I particularly liked the image by Palmer + Pawel (a team consisting of Sebastian Palmer and Pawel Okol) who won the Sport category with a diptych of a Martial Artist after a fight (tight facial close-up with heavy lighting from above which emphasizes his bruises and cuts) paired with a bloodied sponge (again with heavy lighting from the side which shows the texture and intense red colour). I also note from looking at their website that they are interesting in still life, which I read a bit about it’s resurgence in a recent BJP which I might blog about soon. Their take is again in diptych form, pairing similar objects together with a unifiying theme between them, as with the martial artist in their winning image. I like their clean crisp images with simple lighting and uniform backgrounds. Many of their images are ‘how did they do that’ kind of images which make you look twice (for example their ‘sports science’ set). 
Sport Category winner. Taken from Guardian website for personal study purposes
 
Palmer + Pawel Sports Science. Taken for personal study purposes


I also thought the image by Fashion category winner; Peter Franck was great, entitled ‘Table stories’. It shows a top down view of a table with flower centerpiece in the foreground, and then a curled up woman (well her lower half) with stilettos and little black dress, seemingly lying on the floor. It is a totally unconventional ‘Fashion’ image, but that seems to be the direction some high-end fashion photography is going (from what I read in the BJP). After navigating to his website, I find that the unconventional is his thing, with many images being slightly crass, with bad lighting (though careful framing) with similar images presented there. The garish colours and tacky looking props are not what you would expect in a ‘fashion’ magazine and I do wonder if they are actually used in that way? The images look like they may have been taken with a polaroid camera, or perhaps have been edited in post processing to look that way. His website certainly contains a large number of images, so he is clearly a prolific and imaginative photographer (though I admit they are not to my taste particularly)!
Fashion category winner. Taken for personal study purposes


References:
Franck, P (2012) Peter Franck [online] Available from http://www.peterfranck.de/ [Accessed 7 May 2012)

Guardian.co.uk (2012) Guardian.co.uk [online] Available from http://www.guardian.co.uk/artanddesign/gallery/2012/apr/26/sony-world-photography-awards-2012-in-pictures [Accessed 7 May 2012]

S Palmer and P Okol, (2012) Palmer + Pawel [online] Available from http://www.palmerandpawel.com [Accessed 7 May 2012]

S O’Hagan, (2012) Sean O’Hagan On photography blog [online] Available from http://www.guardian.co.uk/artanddesign/2012/apr/27/mitch-dobrowner-iris-d-or-photographer-year# [Accessed 7 May 2012]

Sunday, 6 May 2012

Look Both Ways

I went to the movies last night and saw 'Look Both Ways'. It's not a new film (made in 2005), but it was showing at the GOMA as part of the Contemporary Women in Film that is on at the moment. It's fabulous being about to go along to awesome free movies at the art gallery!!

The movie was great - really artistic, interesting and challenging. It intersperses 'normal' style film-making with drawing/text/images from the internet/animated sketching/photo flashbacks to show snippets of what the main two characters are thinking which added interest, depth and an unusual way of showing what a character is thinking as opposed to voice-over. Death was the key theme through the movie, and the female lead (an artist) constantly sees herself dying, and we see this through her drawings which are flashed onto the screen and animated. The male lead (a photographer), recently diagnosed with cancer, also sees flashing images of research he's done on the internet into his cancer, or subjects he's photographed and seen suffering etc. It's such a powerful medium of showing their thoughts and fears in a visual way.

The storyline was interesting and involved many varied characters which I thought were all depicted really well. I also liked the style of the film and simple framing used throughout. The story linked between a major train crash which kills many people, and the accident where a single man is killed. It was about the impact on so many peoples lives no matter how big or small the issue they are dealing with, and how it's always central to their own lives. The use of weather was also clever - buildup of heat through the high pressure/tension main part of the film which then closed off at the end with a downpour of rain and release of emotional tension in the concurrent stories being depicted towards the end of the film.

I thought it was interesting the way differnt medium were used in this film (photos, drawing, text and video footage). Just yesterday morning I had been reading an interview on Conciencious Blog with Christian Patterson who created Redheaded Peckerwood which was a very popular photobook published last year. He also apparently uses different medium in his book which follows loosely the crime story of two young people travelling across America killing people. He uses archive material, studio setups, landscape images, black-and-white and colour images to tell his story in the book. This idea of mixing up mediums is interesting and would provide another avenue for creativity within a photographic project.

References:
JM Colberg, (2012) Concienctious Blog [online] Available from: http://jmcolberg.com/weblog/extended/archives/a_conversation_with_christian_patterson/ [Accessed 5 May 2012]

Tuesday, 1 May 2012

Workflow

I discovered a fantastic website devoted to workflow recently, called dpbestflow. It has good summaries of all the steps required for a photographic workflow, and I am slowly working my way through reading some of the relevant sections as I prepare to submit my first assignment this week. It should almost be mentioned in the course notes actually as it is very complete and covers all aspects of workflow.

I have also been doing some book reading:

Evening, M. (2005) Adobe Photoshop CS2 for Photographers. Oxford: Elsevier

Evening, M. (2010) The Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 3 Book. Berkeley: Peachpit

American Society of Media Photographers, (2012) dpbestflow [online] Avaliable from: http://www.dpbestflow.org [Accessed May 2012]

Both of these books, and the website above, have contributed to my workflow learnings, and I feel that I am slowly working towards a workflow plan that I can alter for different shooting situations and setups. I am also improving my backup regime to (hopefully) prevent future data loss (or minimize the impact of any possible data loss).

Monday, 16 April 2012

Exercise: Histogram

Aim
The aim of this exercise was to increase familiarity of histograms. I sometimes check the histogram on the computer when reviewing images, and occasionally do so when shooting, but it's not something I do too regularly - I tend to rely more on how the image 'looks' rather than what the numbers tell me. Nonetheless, it's useful to become familiar with histograms and in particular, to be aware when the data is being clipped - either at the shadow or highlight end of the spectrum.

Software comment
I have been somewhat delayed in finishing this exercise (and also working on the first assignment) because I have built a new computer and installed Lightroom 4 for the first time. I've had it up and running a few days now and it's quite different to DigiKam which I used previously. It will be a bit of a learning curve, but I feel that it's an appropriate time for me to be upgrading to industry standard software. So this is the first exercise I am using Lightroom 4 for.

Low Contrast Scene
For my low contrast scene I have chosen a fairly bland view of the base of a large tree, with grey rocks and dirt  in the foreground. It is not particularly inspired, but fits the brief!


Correctly exposed, Low contrast image with histogram

-1 stop EV, Low contrast image with histogram

+1 stop EV, Low contrast image with histogram
For these three low contrast images, the histogram shows a fairly uniformly triangular shape. For the 'correctly' exposed image, the triangle is roughly centrally located. For the -1 stop EV 'underexposed' image, the triangle is pushed to the left, and for the +1 stop EV 'overexposed' image, the triangle is pushed to the right. None of these images has the 'wrong' exposure though, they are just variations depending on what I want the scene to look like (medium grey for the 'correct' exposure).

Average Contrast Scene
For my average contrast scene I have chosen a view over the Brisbane river with buildings, sky and river.


Correctly exposed, Average contrast image with histogram

-1 stop EV, Average contrast image with histogram

+1 stop EV, Average contrast image with histogram
 For these three average contrast images, the histogram shows a flattish, spread out shape. For the 'correctly' exposed image, the distribution is roughly centrally (slightly left) located. For the -1 stop EV 'underexposed' image, the distribution is pushed to the left, and for the +1 stop EV 'overexposed' image, the distribution is pushed to the right. All three images have some 'shadow warnings', as indicated by the triangle shown top left on the histogram. This displays in blue on the image when the mouse is hovered over the triangle. An example is shown below:

-1 stop EV with shadow warnings highlighted in blue
The shadow warnings are useful for highlighting where an image is being clipped at the low end. This means data is lost effectively, and no amount of post-processing will get any detail back in these parts of an image. I sometimes use the functionality on my camera to check for clipping when I am out shooting so that I can adjust my exposure or lighting if necessary to avoid excessive clipping.

High Contrast Scene
For my high contrast scene I have chosen a view looking up at a large tree, with large areas taken up by branches, and light filtering through the foliage.

Correctly exposed, High contrast image with histogram

- 1 stop EV, High contrast image with histogram

+ 1 stop EV, High contrast image with histogram
For these three high contrast images, the histogram shows a non-uniformly distributed bimodal shape spread across the whole spectrum. For the 'correctly' exposed image, the distribution is mostly located on the low end, with a spread of values all the way to the far high end. For the -1 stop EV 'underexposed' image, the distribution is pushed to the left, but still with some values all the way up to the high end, and for the +1 stop EV 'overexposed' image, the distribution is pushed away from the low end with more values at the highest end. The -1 stop image has some 'shadow warnings', mainly on the fringes of the tree and leaves. The 'correct' and +1 stop images have 'highlight warnings', as indicated by the triangle shown top right on the histogram, mainly in the sky. This displays in red on the image when the mouse is hovered over the triangle. An example is shown below:
+ 1 stop EV with highlight clipping warnings shown in red
The highlight warnings are useful for showing where an image is being clipped at the high end. This means data is lost effectively, and no amount of post-processing will get any detail back in these parts of an image. I sometimes use the functionality on my camera to check for clipping when I am out shooting so that I can adjust my exposure or lighting if necessary to avoid excessive clipping. Highlight clipping can be particularly bad in skies, when a graduated neutral density filter can be used to decrease the dynamic range of the image. 'Control the highlight's', or 'expose for the highlights' are good mantras for digital photography (interestingly, I understand it is the opposite for B&W film photography, where it is better to slightly overexpose, and control for the shadows). 

Summary
This exercise is good for increasing awareness of histograms but more importantly, exposure and how to correctly expose images, which I believe we get to more in the next chapter.